|Place of publication:
||Theor. prakt. Handb. Forstbot. 2:1272. 1803, nom. cons. prop.
- [a pending conservation proposal, if adopted, will preserve its current usage]
- fide Telopea 9:427. 2001 an illegitimate, superfluous name (Melbourne ICN Art. 52) for M. communis Desf. (1798), i.e. based on the same type (that of Pyrus malus L.)
- proposed for conservation (nom. cons. prop. against the homotypic and heterotypic synonyms (Melbourne ICN Art. 14) M. communis, M. pumila, and three other names